NAD and NARB Challenges

When a competitor makes false and misleading advertising claims, or challenges your own campaign, you need legal counsel that understands how to effectively communicate your position at the NAD and NARB.

We have a long and successful record of advocating for clients at the National Advertising Division (NAD) and National Advertising Review Board (NARB). Advertisers choose us because of our unmatched experience and knowledge. We bring and defend a substantial number of NAD/NARB challenges every year—as many as if not more than any other firm over the past 35 years.

Industry-defining NAD Leadership

Our NAD/NARB practice is led by John Villafranco. John worked on his first NAD case more than 30 years ago, and he has appeared frequently before the NAD and NARB every year since. John also led a year-long ABA working group that issued the report Self-Regulation of Advertising in the United States: An Assessment of the National Advertising Division. This influential report led to a number of significant rule changes that have been implemented in recent years.

John Villafranco is known for his strong record of handling false advertising matters before the NAD. He is an excellent writer and very skilled at NAD work. He is as talented as they come.”

– Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business

The core Kelley Drye team also includes Christie Thompson, Gonzalo Mon, and Kristi Wolff. Our understanding of the relevant precedent and procedures allows us to obtain insights on NAD’s decision-making process and helps us craft arguments and hone strategies with confidence about what will be most effective to achieve your goals.

Team Members

Some of Kelley Drye’s recent successes before NAD and the NARB include:

  • Successfully petitioned to reopen a decision under the revised rules based on the existence of new evidence. Once the challenge was reopened, Kelley Drye attorneys convinced NAD to reverse its prior decision. This was the first instance NAD agreed to reopen a prior decision and reverse itself.
  • Bringing the first Fast-Track SWIFT complaint (a new type of NAD action guaranteeing resolution within 30 business days) against an advertiser making unsubstantiated environmental benefit claims. The advertiser voluntarily discontinued the practices at issue immediately after the complaint was filed.
  • Successfully defended a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge against a wireless company regarding the characterization of a graphic image. To date, Kelley Drye has been the only firm to successfully defend a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge.
  • Successfully terminated a national advertising campaign on the basis that a material connection existed between the advertiser and the company performing the network analysis upon which the advertiser relied.
  • Successfully defended a major internet service provider’s use of a fastest internet” claim, reversing NAD’s decision before the NARB and convincing the NARB to allow the client to make a broader claim than had been recommended make prior to the challenge.

Other cases of note include the following:

  • Represented leading pet food manufacturer in an NAD challenge regarding tartar reduction and clinically proven” claims for dental dog treats. The NAD ruled in favor of our client on all challenged claims.
  • Represented a global electronics company in a successful challenge involving comparative advertising claims made by its primary rival with respect to 3D TVs.
  • Successfully represented a Fortune 100 home improvement retailer in challenging two of its competitors before the NAD regarding deceptive sales and promotional practices. NAD ruled in favor of our client in both challenges.
  • Represented the maker of an over-the-counter allergy drug in an NAD challenge regarding comparative onset-of-action claims. The NAD ruled in favor of our client on all material points.
  • Represented a major over-the-counter headache relief tablet manufacturer in an NAD challenge and an appeal before the NARB regarding pain relief claims.
  • Represented a leading paint and wall coverings company in an NAD challenge and NARB appeal relating to claims of odor reduction.
  • On behalf of an appliance manufacturer, challenged a competitor’s unqualified germ killing and health-related cleaning and performance claims, endorsement and testimonial claims for ultraviolet vacuum. The NAD recommended that several of the competitor’s claims be discontinued and expressly qualified.
  • On behalf of an air conditioning system provider, challenged the truth and accuracy of a competitor’s express and warranty disclosure claims for HVAC products and 10-year warranty. The NAD recommended that the competitor’s advertisements be modified to clearly and conspicuously disclose the conditions of the warranty.
  • Provided substantiation of performance and warranty claims for exterior paint coating, per the NAD’s request. The NAD determined that a reasonable basis for substantiation of claims was provided by our client, a paint company.
  • Defended a maker of dietary supplements in a challenge regarding substantiation of performance, exclusivity, establishment and expert endorsement claims made in advertising a sleep formula. The Electronic Retailing Self-Regulation Program (ERSP) determined that our client had substantiated claims and recommended one minor modification.
  • Defended one of the world’s largest consumer electronics firms in a competitor challenge regarding advertising claims comparing the company’s plasma televisions to competing LCD televisions. The NAD determined that our client had reasonable basis and substantiation for the principal claims, and recommended one modification.
  • On behalf of a Fortune 50 consumer products company, challenged the truth and accuracy of comparative advertising claims made by a competitor. The NAD determined that the competitor’s comparative claims lacked substantiation.
  • Defended the maker of dietary supplements in a challenge brought by a competitor regarding substantiation of establishment, performance and comparative claims. The ERSP determined that our client provided reasonable basis for performance claims.
  • On behalf of a chemistry trade association, successfully challenged advertising claims made by the maker of baby bottles. The claims at issue attempted to exploit a minority of scientific opinion in the sale of baby bottles that do not contain bisphenol-A. The NAD agreed that the claims were unsubstantiated and recommended that they be discontinued.
  • Challenged two advertising claims made by a dating website, which the NAD recommended they discontinue due to lack of substantiation.
  • Challenged advertising claims of a deep cleaner vacuum. The NAD decision in favor of the competitor was reversed by NARB in favor of our client, which was one of only two NARB reversals in the past 10 years.
  • On behalf of a Fortune 500 athletic equipment and apparel manufacturer, challenged a competitor regarding express and implied superiority claims about its ice hockey helmets. The NAD recommended that the competitor discontinue its comparative performance, endorsement and fatigue claims.
  • Challenged a number of claims in an Internet service provider company’s advertisements. The NAD agreed that these claims were misleading, and the competitor agreed to comply with all aspects of the NAD decision, except for the NAD’s recommendation that the company discontinue the broadband comparisons. The competitor appealed this part of the decision, and the NARB rejected their argument, adopting Kelley Drye’s arguments instead and affirming the NAD’s decision.
  • On behalf of a Fortune 100 industrial conglomerate, challenged product packaging claims made by a competitor’s antifreeze product. The NAD recommended that the competitor modify its packaging to substantiate the truth and accuracy of its claims.
  • Challenged the truth and accuracy of a dietary supplement manufacturer’s comparative pricing claims related to a vitamin supplement. The NAD recommended that the competitor discontinue these claims and modify pricing structure to comply with FTC regulations.
  • Challenged truth and accuracy of claims made by a wireless communications service provider regarding the scope of coverage for their in network rate plan. The NAD recommended the company discontinue or modify its claims. In a separate action, demonstrated that our client’s claim that its service was available coast to coast was substantiated.
  • Defended one of the largest enterprise software companies in a challenge from a competitor for claims made in a database software ad campaign. The NAD determined that our client’s price comparison claims were substantiated.
  • Challenged ads implying that a quick service restaurant’s hamburgers contained substantially more meat than our client’s burgers. After the competitor voluntarily promised to discontinue its claims, the NAD closed the case.
Most recent honors
View all for this practice