On August 26, 2022, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) released its highly anticipated plan
to categorize two per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) as “hazardous substances” subject to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”). This action is one of the more high profile elements of the Agency’s PFAS Strategic Roadmap
, which outlines EPA’s approach to addressing PFAS in a more aggressive and precautionary manner.[1
While the move is unsurprising, when considered in combination with the agency’s recent issuance of extraordinarily low recommended exposure levels for these chemicals, the proposed CERCLA listings may be the trigger of an avalanche of cleanup actions and associated litigation.
If finalized, the rule would subject these two PFAS, for the first time, to the Superfund liability and cost recovery scheme, and greatly enhance the number and pace of site cleanups involving PFAS contamination. Known as “forever chemicals” due to their resistance to breaking down in the environment and widespread presence in soils and water (as well as animals and people), PFAS have been widely used in a variety of fire resistance, thermal insulation, water-proofing and other applications in products ranging across textiles, cookware, food packaging, fire-fighting foams, and cosmetics, among many others. Manufacturers of PFAS-containing products may very well have properties contaminated by these chemicals (which readily move into and through soils and surface and ground waters) and may face extensive cleanup costs through regulatory or private party actions.
Specifically, EPA’s proposal would designate two PFAS, perfluorooctanoic acid (“PFOA”) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (“PFOS”), and their salt and structural isomers, as “hazardous substances” under CERCLA. The CERCLA designation, if finalized, will expose a whole host of potentially responsible parties — current and former owners and operators of PFAS-contaminated facilities; generators and arrangers of PFAS disposal, treatment or transportation; and transporters that take PFAS to a site of their choosing for disposal or treatment — to liability for cleaning up PFAS-contaminated sites. PFAS manufacturers, manufacturers of products that used PFAS, military installations, airports, water treatment facilities and landfills are just a few of the entities that may be subject to PFAS liability under CERCLA.
Additionally, federal entities that transfer or sell their property will be mandated to provide notice about the storage, release, or disposal of PFOA or PFOS on the property as well as provide a covenant (a legal requirement in the deed) warranting that the property has been cleaned up from previous contamination or will do so if discovered in the future.
The proposed rule also imposes new reporting requirements for PFOA and PFOS releases that “meet or exceed the reportable quantity” of one pound or more within 24-hours of release. However, the rule leaves in place all reporting exemptions, including for federally permitted releases and the de minimis
The Proposed Rule is available here
. EPA anticipates publishing the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal Register
soon, initiating a 60-day comment period. EPA also intends to issue in coming days an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that will address the anticipated CERCLA listing of at least some of the over 9,000 separate PFAS chemicals currently in existence. Likely candidates include hexafluoropropylene oxide (“HFPO”) dimer acid and its ammonium salt (“GenX”), perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (“PFBS”), perfluorobutyrate (“PFBA”), perfluorohexanoic acid (“PFHxA”), perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (“PFHxS”), perfluorononanoic acid (“PFNA”), and perfluorodecanoic acid (“PFDA”).
CERCLA § 107(a) 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a). The CERCLA legal infrastructure has been aptly nicknamed by practitioners as the “polluter pays” principle.
This is also required under CERCLA § 120(h).