Amicus
Amicus
Kelley Drye’s National Amicus Practice
Federal and state courts are regularly asked to construe constitutional, statutory and regulatory provisions, and/or apply common law principles. As a result, in many instances, courts render decisions that create “new” law.  Such precedential decisions – especially when issued by appellate courts including the Supreme Court of the United States – can, and frequently will, affect persons beyond the parties in the case, and impact a wide variety of individuals, businesses and industries.

If you are not a party to a case, the best means by which to apprise a court of the potential impact of its decision on you, your business, association or organization is through an amicus curiae, i.e., “friend of the court”, brief. Typically amicus briefs will expand on legal and policy arguments in support of a position forwarded by a party.  However, these briefs present an opportunity to focus the court’s attention on issues and scenarios not necessarily raised by the named parties but that are nonetheless pertinent to how the case should be decided in a manner favorable to the interest of the non-party.

Courts can and do put stock in amicus briefs.  For example, a United States Supreme Court rule of procedure states that amicus briefs “may be of considerable help to the Court.”  Indeed, according to a 2018 National Law Journal article, the Supreme Court referred to amicus briefs in 40-60% of its decisions during the period from 2010 through 2017.

Kelley Drye attorneys have filed numerous amicus briefs for clients and client coalitions in cases throughout the country on the federal and state trial and appellate levels, including in the Supreme Court of the United States.  Our amicus clients have included businesses, associations and organizations in the banking, entertainment, telecommunications, food and beverage, animal-related, and commercial real estate industries, to name just a few.  The matters that we tackled for these clients have concerned diverse areas of the law, such as: constitutional questions dealing with the dormant commerce clause, the Fifth Amendment and judicial takings; common law property issues; intellectual property; federal and state telecommunications laws; the Freedom of Information Act; and environmental statutes and regulations.

We look forward to discussing the propriety of preparing an amicus brief on your individual or your company, or association’s behalf.
 
 

Representative cases in which Kelley Drye filed amicus curiae briefs:

Recent Cases in the Supreme Court of the United States
Pavlock v. Holcomb, ___ U.S. ___ No. 22-282 (2022)

National Pork Producers Council v. Ross ___ U.S. ____, No. 21-468 (2022)

HIKMA Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., v. Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc., 140 S.Ct. 911 (2020)

Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media, 139 S.Ct. 2356 (2019)
 
Recent Cases in the Federal Appellate Courts
Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. EPA. No. 21-1187  D.C. Cir. 2022)

Sunpreme, Inc. v. United States, 945 F.3d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2020)

Matheis v. CSL Plasma, Inc., 36 F.3d 171 (3d Cir. 2019)
 
Recent Cases in State Appellate Courts
In the Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc., on Behalf of Happy, v. Breheny, 2022 WL 212214, ___ N.E.3d ___, N.Y. Slip Op. 03859, (2022)

Sutton 58 Associates LLC v. Pilevsky, 36 N.Y.3d 297 (2020)

Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc., 28 N.Y.3d 583 (2016)
 
 
 

Overview

Kelley Drye’s National Amicus Practice
Federal and state courts are regularly asked to construe constitutional, statutory and regulatory provisions, and/or apply common law principles. As a result, in many instances, courts render decisions that create “new” law.  Such precedential decisions – especially when issued by appellate courts including the Supreme Court of the United States – can, and frequently will, affect persons beyond the parties in the case, and impact a wide variety of individuals, businesses and industries.

If you are not a party to a case, the best means by which to apprise a court of the potential impact of its decision on you, your business, association or organization is through an amicus curiae, i.e., “friend of the court”, brief. Typically amicus briefs will expand on legal and policy arguments in support of a position forwarded by a party.  However, these briefs present an opportunity to focus the court’s attention on issues and scenarios not necessarily raised by the named parties but that are nonetheless pertinent to how the case should be decided in a manner favorable to the interest of the non-party.

Courts can and do put stock in amicus briefs.  For example, a United States Supreme Court rule of procedure states that amicus briefs “may be of considerable help to the Court.”  Indeed, according to a 2018 National Law Journal article, the Supreme Court referred to amicus briefs in 40-60% of its decisions during the period from 2010 through 2017.

Kelley Drye attorneys have filed numerous amicus briefs for clients and client coalitions in cases throughout the country on the federal and state trial and appellate levels, including in the Supreme Court of the United States.  Our amicus clients have included businesses, associations and organizations in the banking, entertainment, telecommunications, food and beverage, animal-related, and commercial real estate industries, to name just a few.  The matters that we tackled for these clients have concerned diverse areas of the law, such as: constitutional questions dealing with the dormant commerce clause, the Fifth Amendment and judicial takings; common law property issues; intellectual property; federal and state telecommunications laws; the Freedom of Information Act; and environmental statutes and regulations.

We look forward to discussing the propriety of preparing an amicus brief on your individual or your company, or association’s behalf.
 

Experience

 

Representative cases in which Kelley Drye filed amicus curiae briefs:

Recent Cases in the Supreme Court of the United States
Pavlock v. Holcomb, ___ U.S. ___ No. 22-282 (2022)

National Pork Producers Council v. Ross ___ U.S. ____, No. 21-468 (2022)

HIKMA Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., v. Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc., 140 S.Ct. 911 (2020)

Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media, 139 S.Ct. 2356 (2019)
 
Recent Cases in the Federal Appellate Courts
Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. EPA. No. 21-1187  D.C. Cir. 2022)

Sunpreme, Inc. v. United States, 945 F.3d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2020)

Matheis v. CSL Plasma, Inc., 36 F.3d 171 (3d Cir. 2019)
 
Recent Cases in State Appellate Courts
In the Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc., on Behalf of Happy, v. Breheny, 2022 WL 212214, ___ N.E.3d ___, N.Y. Slip Op. 03859, (2022)

Sutton 58 Associates LLC v. Pilevsky, 36 N.Y.3d 297 (2020)

Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc., 28 N.Y.3d 583 (2016)
 
Partner
Email (202) 342-8864(202) 342-8864
In his fourth decade of practice, Ira Kasdan is focused on complex civil litigation and alternative dispute resolution.  He has successfully argued, and won, high-stakes litigation in federal ...
Partner
Email (202) 342-8525(202) 342-8525
Wayne routinely works with clients on regulatory, permitting, compliance, and enforcement matters arising under the Clean Air Act (CAA), Clean Water Act (CWA), Endangered Species Act (ESA), Nationa...
Partner
Email (202) 342-8672(202) 342-8672
Paul Singer, former Texas Associate Deputy Attorney General, focuses his practice on state-level regulatory enforcement actions and State Attorneys General investigations, advertising and marketing...
Partner
Email (212) 808-7586(212) 808-7586
Damon Suden is an experienced and talented litigator and trial attorney.  His practice includes commercial and complex civil litigation and class action defense in both state and federal court...
Associate
Email (212) 808-7840(212) 808-7840
Caitlin Hickey is an associate in the firm’s New York office. Her practice focuses on complex commercial litigation, with an emphasis on class action suits. Caitlin has a demonstrated history...
Associate
Email (713) 355-5036(713) 355-5036
Bret Sparks practices in the areas of government relations and public policy, litigation, environmental law, and animal and natural resources law.  His practice involves a multi-disciplinary a...

Publications