The news media have taken notice of the increase in advertising lawsuits and formal grievances filed against competitors. This month, The New York Times
and The AmLaw Daily
reported on the recent up-tick in false advertising challenges.
The New York Times
article, “Best Soup Ever? Suits Over Ads Demand Proof”
from November 22, 2009, noted that the number of cases appears to have grown as the economy has declined. Kelley Drye & Warren partner, John E. Villafranco, explained, “In this economy, where margins are a bit tighter, a lot of marketing departments have decided to become more aggressive in going after their competitors in the hopes that they can either protect their market position or capture additional market share.”
Most advertising cases are filed either in the courts or before the self-regulatory body, the National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus (“NAD”). The New York Times
reported that complaints filed with the NAD hit a record number of 84 in 2008.
The year before, the NAD received only 62 complaints, and it received only 52 complaints in 2006. The NAD is on track for a new record in 2009, with 82 complaints filed so far.
No reliable numbers are available for false advertising cases in the courts, but lawyers in the field report an increase. Cases in the courts and at the NAD have involved advertising for telecommunications products and services, health benefits claims for foods and dietary supplements,
advertising for over-the-counter drugs, advertising for personal care products, advertising about taste tests, pet food advertising, claims about savings to consumers, and claims that products are environmentally friendly.
For an analysis of alternatives to standard court proceedings, see the article, “Making it Stop: A Practical Guide to Challenging Your Competitor’s Advertising Claims.”
While competitor challenges have heated up, advertisers also should be aware that the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has remained active and aggressive. David Vladeck became the Director of the Consumer Protection Division in April. He has stated in speeches that enforcement priorities will include advertising related to
consumer economic welfare, advertising related to consumer health, advertising about environmental benefits, and advertising to children. Cases initiated by the FTC have reflected these priorities.
Additionally, on October 5, 2009, the FTC released stringent new guidelines for using endorsers in advertisements. These guidelines affect a broad array of advertisers, including those who do not use typical consumer, celebrity, or expert endorsers. The guidelines, for instance, cover the situation where a company gives free
products to bloggers for their honest, unedited opinions and the situation where an employee, on her own accord, disseminates a message about her employer’s products or services on the internet. For more information, reference the Kelley Drye Client Advisory, “FTC Issues Final Sweeping Changes to Endorsement and Testimonial Guides.”
Please contact a member of Kelley Drye’s Advertising Law Group if you have any questions about challenging or defending advertising claims, or complying with FTC requirements.
The attorneys in Kelley Drye & Warren's Advertising and Marketing practice group
have broad experience at the FTC, the offices of state attorneys general, the National Advertising Division (NAD), and the networks; substantive expertise in the areas of
advertising, promotion marketing and privacy law, as well as consumer class action defense; and a national reputation for excellence in advertising litigation and NAD proceedings. We are available to assist clients with developing strategies to address issues contained in this Advisory.
John E. Villafranco